Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Joshua Tolley <eggyk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> A question: why does attdistinct become entry #5 instead of going at the end?
>> I assume it's because the order here controls the column order, and it makes
>> sense to have attdistinct next to attstattarget, since they're related. Is
>> that right? Thanks in advance...
> Yep, that was my thought.
We generally want fixed-size columns before variable-size ones, to ease
accessing them from C code. So it shouldn't go at the end in any case.
Beyond that it's mostly aesthetics, with maybe some thought for avoiding
unnecessary alignment padding.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
