Magnus Hagander wrote: > How does this look? > > Passes my tests, but I can't really reproduce the requirement to retry, > so I haven't been able to test that part :(
I'm disappointed :-( I thought this thread (without reading it too deeply) was about fixing the problem that backends sometimes fail to connect to shmem, on a system that's been running for a while. But I see that it's about recycling the segment after a crash (and/or restart?), so it has no relationship to the other case at all :-( I can't comment on the patch itself. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
