Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> Passes my tests, but I can't really reproduce the requirement to retry, >> so I haven't been able to test that part :( > > The patch looks sane to me. If you want to test, perhaps reducing the > sleep to 1 msec or so would reproduce the need to go around the loop > more than once. (Don't forget to put the machine under additional > load, too.)
I've applied this to HEAD and 8.3 so we can get some buildfarm testing on it as well. Andrew, any chance you can get 8.3-tip tested with your client? Or at least in your own reproducable-environment? I didn't backpatch to 8.2, because the code is completely different there. We should probably consider doing it once we know if this fixes the actual issue, but I don't want to spend the effort on backporting it until we know it works. //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
