Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes:
> Yes, the old xlog itself is not used again. But, the *old file* might
> be recycled and used later. The case that I'm looking at is that the
> symlink to a temporary area is recycled. Am I missing something?
Actually, I think the right fix for that would be to add defenses to
xlog.c to not try to "recycle" a file that is a symlink. No good could
possibly come of that.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
