Hans-Juergen Schoenig wrote:
> hello everybody,
>
> from my side the goal of this discussion is to extract a consensus so
> that we can go ahead and implement this issue for 8.5.
> our customer here needs a solution to this problem and we have to come
> up with something which can then make it into PostgreSQL core.
> how shall we proceed with the decision finding process here?
> i am fine with a GUC and with an grammar extension - i just need a
> decision which stays unchanged.
Do we have answer for Hans-Juergen here?
I have added a vague TODO:
Consider a lock timeout parameter
* http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-05/msg00485.php
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
