Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Selena Deckelmann <sel...@endpoint.com> wrote:
>> Suggested revision of Robert's prose:
>> 
>> Because genetic query optimization may be triggered, increasing
>> from_collapse_limit should be considered relative to <xref
>> linkend="guc-geqo-threshold">.

> Here's my attempt.

I applied the attached, along with some other wordsmithing.

                        regards, tom lane

***************
*** 2252,2261 ****
          The planner will merge sub-queries into upper queries if the
          resulting <literal>FROM</literal> list would have no more than
          this many items.  Smaller values reduce planning time but might
!         yield inferior query plans.  The default is eight.  It is usually
!         wise to keep this less than <xref linkend="guc-geqo-threshold">.
          For more information see <xref linkend="explicit-joins">.
         </para>
        </listitem>
       </varlistentry>
  
--- 2261,2275 ----
          The planner will merge sub-queries into upper queries if the
          resulting <literal>FROM</literal> list would have no more than
          this many items.  Smaller values reduce planning time but might
!         yield inferior query plans.  The default is eight.
          For more information see <xref linkend="explicit-joins">.
         </para>
+ 
+        <para>
+         Setting this value to <xref linkend="guc-geqo-threshold"> or more
+         may trigger use of the GEQO planner, resulting in nondeterministic
+         plans.  See <xref linkend="runtime-config-query-geqo">.
+        </para>
        </listitem>
       </varlistentry>
  

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to