On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Well, it sounds about perfect for my use case too (which is > approximately the same as Tom's), but the description makes it sound > unsupported. It doesn't work on Windows which doesn't bother me > personally but may be a showstopper more generally. It's not a showstopper for me. Can't speak for Magnus, Andrew or anyone else working on Windows though. I imagine those two are the most likely to have issues if they're back-patching - and that should just be a matter of disk space. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
