"David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes: > On Jun 4, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> It seems we have two reasonable possibilities for 8.4: revert that >> patch and keep contrib/intarray's behavior the same as it was, or leave the >> patch in and document that there was a behavioral change.
> You can't keep the patch and update intarray to behave like it did > before? Uh, no. The point is that intarray's operators behave(d) differently from the core operators. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers