-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
> Normally we would consider a pg_proc change as requiring a catversion > bump. Since we are already past 8.4 beta we couldn't do that without > forcing an initdb for beta testers. I think a serious issue like this warrants a bump. It seems like you are saying that at any other time in the release cycle this would be an automatic bump, so let's keep a consistent policy and bump it. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane g...@turnstep.com End Point Corporation PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200906091241 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkoukLkACgkQvJuQZxSWSshalACg8UfcyvTF2TxazvwwzxDNDIuM dpEAoJYVaS8czeR79dyJOTAoXLghSgKS =21ax -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
