On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Normally we would consider a pg_proc change as requiring a catversion > bump. Since we are already past 8.4 beta we couldn't do that without > forcing an initdb for beta testers. What I'd like to do about this > is change the proisstrict settings in pg_proc.h but not bump catversion. > This will ensure the fix is in place and protecting future coding, > although possibly not getting enforced in 8.4 production instances that > were upgraded from beta (if there are any such). >
why not bump it just at the final release. i don't think beta testers are on production so they still have to initdb production servers anyway -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
