Hi Tom, How much concern is there for the contention for use cases where the WAL can't be bypassed?
Thanks, Alan On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner <ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes: > > The following copying 3M rows(each) into a seperate table of the same > > database. > > Is this with WAL, or bypassing WAL? Given what we've already seen, > a lot of contention for WALInsertLock wouldn't surprise me much here. > It should be possible to bypass that though. > > regards, tom lane > > >
