Alan Li <a...@truviso.com> writes: > How much concern is there for the contention for use cases where the WAL > can't be bypassed?
If you mean "is something going to be done about it in 8.4", the
answer is "no". This is a pre-existing issue that there is no simple
fix for.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
