On Jun 24, 2009, at 2:12 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:

The core team isn't appropriate for this. We'd start a new committee/list somewhere instead, and it would be part of the same effort which produces a "recommended" list of extensions and drivers for packagers.

It'd still deprecate contrib/, which could maybe become examples/?

No, it would not be distributed with core at all. They could all be packaged up together in a single distribution of recommended modules, however.

This may not be necessary if simple download-unzip-and-install is simple enough.

I hope it'll get simple enough, yes, as simple as current PGXS modules from source are:
- cvs up or wget
- tar xzf ... && cd ...
- make install
- psql -f ... mydb

Then it could also be easily scripted, too.

PGXS has it covered, and we're not yet there, but I'm thinking PGXS should be a pre requisite of the extension facility as far as extensions authors are concerned. Then packagers will make it so that users won't typically face those details.

+1.

Best,

David

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to