On Jun 24, 2009, at 2:12 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
The core team isn't appropriate for this. We'd start a new
committee/list somewhere instead, and it would be part of the same
effort which produces a "recommended" list of extensions and
drivers for packagers.
It'd still deprecate contrib/, which could maybe become examples/?
No, it would not be distributed with core at all. They could all be
packaged up together in a single distribution of recommended modules,
however.
This may not be necessary if simple download-unzip-and-install is
simple enough.
I hope it'll get simple enough, yes, as simple as current PGXS
modules from source are:
- cvs up or wget
- tar xzf ... && cd ...
- make install
- psql -f ... mydb
Then it could also be easily scripted, too.
PGXS has it covered, and we're not yet there, but I'm thinking PGXS
should be a pre requisite of the extension facility as far as
extensions authors are concerned. Then packagers will make it so
that users won't typically face those details.
+1.
Best,
David
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers