to...@tuxteam.de writes:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 05:03:11PM +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>> It's becoming somewhat tricky, but maybe the test to do for the
>> optimisation to get used is n >= threshold && str[n-6] == 0x20, Ã la
>> Boyer/Moore?
> That's cute. What about comparing the last aligned word which completely
> fits in the buffer? Something along the lines of (assuming four-byte
> words)
> * (int*) (4 * ((int) &buf[0]) / 4)
We're trying to avoid adding cycles to the optimization-is-useless case.
The more expensive this test gets, the slower the unoptimizable case
becomes.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
