On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 06:28:32PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > David Fetter wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 05:27:19PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >>> David Fetter wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>> * Users who come from MySQL every once in a while, annoyed that >>>>> we don't support "GRANT ... *" syntax. >>>>> >>>> I'm missing what's wrong with a wild-card GRANT syntax for this >>>> case. >>>> >>> Without a major change in the way we do permissions, it will not >>> work prospectively. We have no way ATM to store permissions for an >>> object that does not currently exist. >>> >> >> There have been previous discussions of prospective permissions >> changes. Are we restarting them here? > > *shrug* > > It's not on the TODO list. I recall it being raised from time to time > but I certainly don't recall a consensus that it should be done, nor > how,
That was my recollection, too. > so if you're implying that such a thing is a settled decision I > suspect you're not entirely correct. By no means. > Of course, my memory has been known to have errors ... Same with mine ;) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
