Tom Lane wrote: > Joshua Tolley <eggyk...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 02:07:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I think this is pretty much nonsense --- most queries run all their plan > >> nodes concurrently to some extent. You can't usefully say that a query > >> is "on" some node, nor measure progress by whether some node is "done". > > > What about showing the outermost node where work has started? > > That's always the outermost node; what would it tell you?
[ Repost ] I think the only resonable solution would be to consider the estimated cost of each node and then compute what percentage complete each node is. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
