On Tuesday 07 July 2009 19:45:44 Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu> writes: > > We should benchmark the planner on increasingly large sets of > > relations on a typical developer machine and set geqo to whatever > > value the planner can handle in that length of time. I suspect even at > > 10s you're talking about substantially larger values than the current > > default. > The problem is to find some realistic "benchmark" cases. That's one > reason why I was pestering Andreas to see his actual use cases ... I will start writing a reduced/altered schema tomorrow then...
Andres PS: Its "Andres" btw ;-) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
