Hello, Bernd. You wrote:
BH> --On Dienstag, Juli 07, 2009 18:07:08 -0400 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> BH> wrote: >> Enum. If we do this then it seems entirely fair that someone might >> want other settings someday. Also, it seems silly to pick a format >> partly on the grounds that it's expansible, and then not make the >> control GUC expansible. Perhaps >> >> SET bytea_output = [ hex | traditional ] BH> I like the enum much better, too, but BH> SET bytea_output = [ hex | escape ] BH> looks better to me (encode/decode are using something like this already). BH> -- BH> Thanks BH> Bernd Yeah, this looks nice for me too -- With best wishes, Pavel mailto:pa...@gf.microolap.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
