On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Fujii Masao<masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > If the above is OK, should I update the patch ASAP? or > suspend that update until many other comments arrive? > I'm concerned that frequent small updating interferes with > a review.
I decided (perhaps foolishly), to assign reviewers for the two smaller patches that you extracted from this first, and to hold off on assigning a reviewer for the main patch until those reviews were completed: http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/3f0b79eb0907022341m1d36a841x19c3e2a5a6906...@mail.gmail.com http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/3f0b79eb0907030037g515f3337o9092279c6234...@mail.gmail.com So I think you should update ASAP in this case. As soon as we get some reviewers freed up from the initial reviewing round, I will assign one or more reviewers to the main Sync Rep patch. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
