On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 01:49:14PM +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote: > Joshua, > > I found your name as a reviewer at the commitfest.postgresql.org. > > However, I don't think the initial proposal of the largeobject > security is now on the state to be reviewed seriously. > > In my preference, it should be reworked based on the TOASTing > approach as discussed in this thread previously, if we can > find a reasonable solution for the issue I raised before.
For whatever it's worth, I consider my capability limited to making sure the patch applies and coming up with a few interesting ways of testing it out, but not seriously studying the code and knowing when there might be a competitive alternative implementation. I don't yet understand the issues that have been raised, but will quit working to review the patch if you feel it's not ready. Thanks for letting me know; I hope a solution to the problems you've brought up is forthcoming. -- Joshua Tolley / eggyknap End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
