Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 16:14, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I'm not really insisting on a redesign. I'm talking about the places >> where the code author appears not to have understood that ERROR means >> FATAL, because the code keeps plugging on after it anyway. As far as >> I can see, using ERROR at lines 3630, 3657, 3674, and 3693 is just >> plain bogus, and changing to LOG there requires no other fixing.
> But. I'll look into cleaning those up for HEAD anyway, but due to lack > of reports I think we should skip backpatch. Reasonable? Fair enough. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers