Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Hmm. As stated, I would expect pg_ctl to make it worse. I've been playing with this, and I think the problem was that we wanted a non-zero exit from the script if the start failed. That's trivial with pg_ctl -w but not running postgres directly. I guess I could run pg_ctl status in a loop after the start. The reason is that we don't want certain other processes attempting to start until and unless the database they use has started successfully. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
