"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes:
> Thanks Andrew, Alvaro, and Chander. You've given me some thoughts to
> toss around. Of course, any of these is going to be somewhat more
> complex than using [ pg_ctl -w ]
Yeah. I wonder if we shouldn't expend a bit more effort to make that
way bulletproof. As I mentioned the other day, if there were a way for
pg_ctl to pass down its parent's PID then we could have the postmaster
exclude that as a false match, and then using pg_ctl would be just as
safe as invoking the postmaster directly.
The two ways I can see to do that are to add a command line switch
to the postmaster, or to pass the PID as an environment variable,
say "PG_GRANDPARENT_PID". The latter is a bit uglier but it would
require touching much less code (and documentation).
Thoughts?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
