On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Alvaro Herrera<alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Robert Haas escribió: >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> > But trying to VACUUM FULL that table is going to be horridly painful >> > too, and you'll still have bloated indexes afterwards. You might as >> > well just live with the 50% waste, especially since if you did a >> > full-table update once you'll probably do it again sometime. >> > >> > I'm having a hard time believing that VACUUM FULL really has any >> > interesting use-case anymore. >> >> What if your large table doesn't have an index? Then there's no way to >> cluster. > > But there's nothing saying we cannot provide a version of CLUSTER that > does not follow any index and just copies the live tuples.
Agreed. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
