On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Robert Haas<robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm a bit skeptical about partitioning as a solution, too. The > planner is just not clever enough with partitioned tables, yet. >
analyze and vacuum a *very* big table and even scan a huge index is not a joke neither... and yes the planner is not very clever about partitioning and certainly that is something we need to fix not something we have to live with... no that that will be easy but hey! we have very brilliant people here (you being one of them) -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers