* Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | | > resources as well that should not conflict with other packages, like temp | > tables or such. It then seems to me that using schemas can solve everything | > that packages do and more ? | | Yeah. I am wondering whether we couldn't support Oracle-style packages | as a thin layer of syntactic sugar on top of schemas. I am concerned | about the prospect that "foo.bar" might mean either "object bar in | schema foo" or "object bar in package foo".
Agreed, and in Sybase you may declare a procedure in a schema(or database which is the Sybase term). If you want it global you declare it in the "master" schema. -- Gunnar Rønning - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
