Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > Well, I think the objection was that it would slow COPY down to have to > go though the executor in the copy-as-source scenario. But maybe that > would happen anyway, and maybe we don't care, we'd just accept that it > wouldn't be nearly as fast as a raw copy.
I haven't heard complaints about the COPY (query) syntax, which is the same thing in the opposite direction. You can't expect that flexibility costs zero. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers