Mark Mielke <[email protected]> writes:
> My God - I thought 32k databases in the same directory was insane.
> 220M+???????
Considering that the system catalogs alone occupy about 5MB per
database, that would require an impressive amount of storage...
In practice I think users would be complaining about our choice
to instantiate the catalogs per-database a lot sooner than they'd
hit the subdirectory-count limit.
BTW, there is another avenue that the OP could look into if he
really wants this many databases on a UFS filesystem: split them up
into multiple tablespaces.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
