Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> Mmm, I like that. Putting that bunch of hairy logic in a subroutine
> instead of repeating it in several places definitely seems better. I
> don't really like the name "clause_matches_join", though. It's more
> like "clause has well-defined sides, and mark which is which as a
> side-effect".
It was the first thing that came to mind ... got a better idea?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
