On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Mmm, I like that. Putting that bunch of hairy logic in a subroutine >> instead of repeating it in several places definitely seems better. I >> don't really like the name "clause_matches_join", though. It's more >> like "clause has well-defined sides, and mark which is which as a >> side-effect". > > It was the first thing that came to mind ... got a better idea?
clause_has_well_defined_sides()? ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
