On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 22:54 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > It seems like there is some support for what this patch is trying to > do, but much disagreement about the details of how to get there. > Where do we go from here?
I think the next step would be to outline what changes would be necessary in pg_ctl to implement LSB behavior. And then decide case by case whether it should become the default, an option, or is not appropriate for pg_ctl. Kevin apparently sort of agreed to do that when he came back. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
