On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 22:54 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> It seems like there is some support for what this patch is trying to >> do, but much disagreement about the details of how to get there. >> Where do we go from here? > > I think the next step would be to outline what changes would be > necessary in pg_ctl to implement LSB behavior. And then decide case by > case whether it should become the default, an option, or is not > appropriate for pg_ctl. > > Kevin apparently sort of agreed to do that when he came back.
Given the lack of progress here, I'm going to move this one to "Returned with Feedback" for now. I think Kevin is busy with his non-PostgreSQL life, and there's always next CommitFest. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
