David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Oct 4, 2009, at 1:57 PM, David Fetter wrote: > > >It's less about like or dislike and more about facing up to the > >reality that we've got a major legacy foot-gun left over from the > >experimentation of the Berkeley days. > > I think you're going to need to be a bit more concrete than that. In > what way is it a foot-gun? What examples can you provide? What, > exactly, are the issues?
While I don't agree with David Fetter's premise, I think rehashing how we handle VIEWs would be a good step towards updatable views. Right now, the implementation of that is stalled precisely because of the rule system. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
