2009/10/5 Dan Colish <d...@unencrypted.org>: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 11:28:13AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Dan Colish wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 09:50:18AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> > > On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 18:24 -0700, Dan Colish wrote: >> >> > > > You can definitely create updatable views using rules. >> > > >> > > Sure you can, but they won't work in various significant corner cases. >> > > >> > > Search the archives for "updatable views" for details. >> > >> > I don't even want updatable views! >> >> Why would you argue that point? They are specified in the SQL standard >> somewhere. >> > > I do not really think updatable views are needed. Maybe when the standard was > written things are different; I guess you're talking about 2003. Just because > something is in a standard, doesnt mean it has to be implemented. As long as > you > don't implement something outside of the standard, I do not have an issue.
Updatable views are important for porting enterprise applications. I thing, so it has a sense. Regards Pavel Stehule > > -- > --Dan > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers