Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > I think the setting ought be called linestyle unicode (instead of > utf8), since the same setting would presumably work in case we ever > implement UTF-16 support on the client side. Yeah, anytime one gets sloppy with the distinction between a character set and a character encoding scheme, one tends to regret it, sooner or later. Here's we're talking about which glyphs to show -- that's based on a character set. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
