On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > Doing it with a GUC will not be nearly so useful as having it in the wire > protocol, IMNSHO. Just one example: it wouldn't be present in connection > records, because it wouldn't be set yet.
I quite like the flexibility of being able to set/show a GUC at any time, but you raise a good point. I'll need to venture into previously unknown territory (for me at least :-p) to figure out how best to do that, and if possible keep the GUC... -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
