On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Jaime Casanova <jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> >> Oh, and apologies to Jaime who I just noticed had volunteered to work >> on this :-( >> > > never mind... i get blocked for the ugliness of the libpq api connect > functions... > and my first attempt to solve that was seriously broken...
Funny - I reverted my first attempt at that bit too. > besides, as Robert mention, because of pooler connections using a GUC > is more appropiate... I'd like both options to be available to the programmer. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
