2009/10/19 Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org>: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> There are some log parser's and analysers. So people use reduced log >> often. The reductions rules should be based on application name. Why >> not? And when somebody modifies to appliacation name, then these logs >> finish in '/dev/null. > > So if your insecure app worries you, just don't use %a in the log > prefix, or ignore the column in the CSV logs.
I'll know so %a is insecure, but what other users? Every live application is potencially insecure. I agree, so this value is useful for debuging, but with proposed features the value is diskutable. Pavel > > > > -- > Dave Page > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
