Why? Are they causing problems leaving them there? What sorts of problems will arise by *removing* them? I know with OACS, add_missing_from is required right now, but that code *should* be fixable, and there is an overwhelming reason from an advancement perspective to having it removed (ie. new code that Tom is developing), but what about the rest ... ?

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, David Fetter wrote:

Folks,

I'd like to see about removing the following GUCs:

add_missing_from (should be off)
array_nulls (should be on)
commit_delay (no need for this knob)
commit_siblings (no need for this knob)
default_with_oids (should be off)
password_encryption (should be on)
regex_flavor (should be advanced, regex flavor can be controlled on a per-regex 
basis when they're advanced)
sql_inheritance (should be on)
standard_conforming_strings (should be on)
synchronize_seqscans (should be on)
track_activities (should be on)
track_counts (should be on)
transform_null_equals (should probably be off)
update_process_title (should be on)

What say on each?  When?

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


----
Marc G. Fournier                        Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scra...@hub.org                                     http://www.hub.org

Yahoo:yscrappy    Skype: hub.org    ICQ:7615664    MSN:scra...@hub.org

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to