On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> writes: >> This might be a good argument for changing that going forward, but >> it will be *years* before we can rely on it for anything. > > That's what I meant by 'a few releases' (major, not minor).
BTW, any thoughts on Heikki's suggestions of hacking about the 'options' value or retrying the connection vs. just doing a SET post-connection in libpq? It's pretty certain that whatever I choose you probably won't like :-p -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com PGDay.EU 2009 Conference: http://2009.pgday.eu/start -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
