2009/11/3 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes: >> I'm not excited about using NOT, because I think it has a hint of a >> double-negative when combined with EXCLUSION. > > Well, the choice of EXCLUSION isn't set in stone either ... >
Is this really a generalized uniqueness constraint, extended to support operators other than = ? Perhaps sticking with the word UNIQUE might be more suggestive of this: UNIQUE (room_number WITH = , during WITH &&) or: UNIQUE (room_number , during USING && ) - Dean -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
