On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 09:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > Ooh, that's kind of neat. But I think you'd need EXCLUSIVE (a, b) BY > > (=, =), since it could equally well be EXCLUSIVE (a, b) BY (=, &&). > > Yeah, we definitely want some parentheses delimiting the expression. > EXCLUSIVE still feels like the wrong part-of-speech though. How > about EXCLUDING (...) BY ... instead?
I think EXCLUDING conflicts with the EXCLUDING in LIKE. Also, it becomes a little more difficult to place the access method clause, because "EXCLUDING USING gist" doesn't sound great. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers