Hello I am sorry. I'll send a actualised version today.
Pavel 2009/11/13 Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>: > Pavel Stehule escribió: >> Hello >> >> actualised version: enhance check inside sql function > > What is this against? It has a few suspicious chunks, such as > > *************** > *** 358,364 **** > > funcexpr->funcid = funcid; > funcexpr->funcresulttype = rettype; > ! funcexpr->funcresulttypmod = -1; // TODO STEHULE > funcexpr->funcretset = retset; > funcexpr->funcformat = COERCE_EXPLICIT_CALL; > funcexpr->args = fargs; > --- 365,371 ---- > > funcexpr->funcid = funcid; > funcexpr->funcresulttype = rettype; > ! funcexpr->funcresulttypmod = rettypmod; > funcexpr->funcretset = retset; > funcexpr->funcformat = COERCE_EXPLICIT_CALL; > funcexpr->args = fargs; > > > > This ended up in ./src/backend/parser/parse_func.c.rej > > There are other rejects and I'm not sure if I should fix them (at least > the first couple look trivial, though it's against a bunch of code > that last changed in Aug. last year) or ask for a better version ... > > -- > Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
