Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2009/11/17 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> There are other issues but these are the ones I think we'd need to
>> resolve before not after putting in function typmods. Â It'd be
>> extremely painful and non-backwards-compatible to change our minds
>> later about function identity or coercion rules.
> I am sure, so this patch cannot break any current code.
My point is that if we release 8.5 with these semantics (which as far
as I can tell were not designed, but just fell out of what made for the
shortest patch) then we'll be stuck with them thereafter.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
