On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 11:31 -0500, Chris Browne wrote: > >> Ah, but the thing is, what was proposed wasn't "totally evilly >> draconian." >> >> There's a difference between: >> >> "You haven't reviewed any patches - we'll ignore you forever!" >> >> and >> >> "Since you haven't reviewed any patches, we are compelled to defer your >> patches until the next CommitFest." >> >> It's enough pain to make people think, but it's not *totally* punitive. > > It is important to remember we are all volunteers here. Any increase to > the barrier of contribution is a bad one.
True. But "not enough reviewers to review all the patches we get" is also a barrier to contribution. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
