Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> There's no equivalent of XLogArchivingActive()?
> XLogArchivingMode() == false enables us to skip WAL-logging in > operations like CLUSTER or COPY, which is a big optimization. I don't > see anything like that in Hot Standby. There is a few small things that > could be skipped, but nothing noticeable. Huh? Surely HS requires XLogArchivingMode as a prerequisite ... > It's great from usability point of view that you don't need to enable it > beforehand, ... which also means that I don't understand this statement. > Anyway, I think I have enough courage now to just rip out the VACUUM > FULL support from HS. If VACUUM FULL is still there when we're ready to > go to beta, we can introduce a "do you want VACUUM FULL or hot standby?" > switch in the master, or some other ugly workaround. Agreed, we have more than enough worries without worrying about making that work. (Do we have a list of open issues somewhere, so that this won't get forgotten?) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers