Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> There's no equivalent of XLogArchivingActive()? > >> XLogArchivingMode() == false enables us to skip WAL-logging in >> operations like CLUSTER or COPY, which is a big optimization. I don't >> see anything like that in Hot Standby. There is a few small things that >> could be skipped, but nothing noticeable. > > Huh? Surely HS requires XLogArchivingMode as a prerequisite ...
Oh, sure! But there's no switch that needs to be enabled in the master in addition to that. > (Do we have a list of open issues somewhere, so that this > won't get forgotten?) I'm keeping one as I bump into things. I'll post it again soon. Actually, I should probably put it on the wiki. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
