Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > We need to discuss a "partial recovery" before the partial replication. > If you do the filtering on the sending side you dont actually need partial > recover in the sense that you filter in the rmgr or similar. > > Or do I miss something?
Sorry, I didn't explain well. I just suggested the order of development. I think paritial recovery is easier than partition replication because we don't need to think network nor multiple clients in recovery. Also, this feature can be developed on the Streming Replication, but it is under development -- the code is not fixed. So, I'd suggest to start the development from independent parts from Streaming Replication. I believe the partial replication will require modules developed for the partial recovery in the future. Regards, --- ITAGAKI Takahiro NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
