Marko Kreen <mark...@gmail.com> writes:
> No, at least both pgbouncer and pgpool consider only (username, database)
> pair as pool identifier. Rest of the startup params are tuned on the fly.
> And I think that should stay that way.
If you're happy with handling the existing connection parameters in a given
way, why would you not want application_name behaving that same way?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
