On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
>> If we patch the back branches like that, anyone who's annoyed by the >> extra connection cycle just has to update to latest minor release >> of their server to make it work more smoothly. Comments? >> >> regards, tom lane > > Given that this can probably be considered an *extremely* safe patch > :-), I say go for it. It'll certainly make for less error reports > around something that's not an error. > > If the patch was in any way complex I'd object against it, but this > clearly isn't... Agreed. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
